Shakespeares Use of Jealousy in Othello Essay - 1550 Words

Shakespeares Use of Jealousy in Othello The characteristics of Shakespearean tragedy usually work on a five-part structure, being the five acts. Part one can be seen as the exposition, introducing the main characters and commences the action. Part two is the development of the play, introducing complications. Part three is the climax, bringing everything to a head. In this part understanding is compulsive as there is a change in direction, the pivotal act. In part four the climax in part three is developed leading to the final part, where the revelation and resolution are justified. It can also be said it is characterised by a ‘tragic flaw’, being the imperfection of the heroic character which†¦show more content†¦In the following scene, Iago shows how deceitful he really is as throughout the first scene the audience is given warning to what to look out for Iago’s behaviour and language. ‘Tis well I am found by you’ (I.ii.47) shows the close relationship and trust between Cassi o and Othello. Act 3 Scene 3 can be viewed as the key scene of jealousy and deception as well as many other themes. Iago has analysed Othellos tendency to insecurity and overreaction however, did not imagine his deceptiveness would lead to his outburst of ‘I’ll tear her all to pieces!’ (III.iii.433) In Act 5 we see all of Iago’s activities coming to an end as he uses whatever means possible not to be caught using his trickery until the very end. ‘Of gold and jewels that I bobbed from him,’ (V.i.16) Roderigo was the main pawn in his plan, being blind to what Iago was doing to him until his death. When Iago injures Cassio and he returns to the scene, all those around are still oblivious to his participation, ‘O me, lieutenant! What villans have done this?’ (V.i.56-7). Irony is involved here, as Cassio is talking to the man who injured him, completely oblivious to the fact, showing no suspicion. As an audience we may agree with Iago’s evaluation of Othello and the reasons of his jealousy because of his rejectedShow MoreRelatedHow Does Shakespeare Use Language and Dramatic Devices to Present the Theme of Jealousy in Othello?1497 Words   |  6 PagesHow does Shakespeare use language and dramatic devices to present the theme of jealousy in Othello? ----- Othello weaves a tragic tale of love, jealousy and murder. Set in Venice and progressing to Cyprus, Shakespeare’s Othello follows the cursed path of its namesake, a black soldier whose love for his wife ultimately results in her death. Woven into the socially and emotionally delicate plot is a multitude of key themes, including race (Othello’s colour), love, and jealousy. A key figure, if notRead MoreTheme Of Monstrous Jealousy In William Shakespeares Othello1271 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s â€Å"Othello†, illustrates four of themes in the play. One of the themes is extreme jealousy can make a person act like a monster. In the play, Shakespeare uses Othello, Roderigo, and Iago to prove the theme of Monstrous Jealousy by Othello slapping Desdemona in front of the Public of Venusians calling her cruel names and Developing evil schemes to kill Desdemona at night. Iago tells the lie to Othello about Cassio and Desdemona to and convincing Othello to believe in it. RoderigoRead MoreJealousy, Love, And Death964 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeare is known for his use of recurring themes, particularly those of betrayal, love, and death. These themes are present in Othello. However, the most dynamic of themes in this play is jealousy. White describes jealousy as a â€Å"complex of thoughts, feelings, and actions which follow threa ts to self-esteem and/or threats to the existence or quality of a relationship† (qtd in UK essays par 1). Two types of jealousy are presented to the audience in Othello; the kind of jealousy that is fear ofRead MoreJealousy In Othello Essay1517 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare’s, Othello, incorporates both perspective and action, however, Shakespeare adds an additional element: temporality. In Othello, Shakespeare personifies jealousy through the character Iago to argue that our perspectives may be temporary, but our actions are permanent. Jealousy is not incorporeal in Othello. While most assume jealousy is an emotion that people feel internally, within the confines of this play, jealousy is animated, and thus external. How does Shakespeare accomplish thisRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Othello By William Shakespeare757 Words   |  4 Pages The Tragedy of Othello by William Shakespeare William Shakespeare uses many literary devices to enhance and provide greater complexity in his works. More specifically, the theme, symbolism, and dramatic irony are used to enrich Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Othello. The plot is definitely engaging but the theme allows for an universal human correspondence, furthering the depth of the author’s message. The element of symbolism contributes to the theme of Shakespeare’s tragedy. Symbolism expressesRead MoreCharles Thao. Mrs. Koth. 4Th Hour. 4/6/17. William Shakespeare’S,717 Words   |  3 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s, Othello, a character named Iago said â€Å"O, beware, my lord, of jealousy: It is a green-eyed monster.† In present day, this quote would mean the word jealousy. Shakespeare is believed to be warning people people that jealousy widely effective and could cause havoc. In The Tragedy of Othello, by William Shakespeare, the feeling of jealousy can make people change their feeli ngs towards something and make them pursue what they want. The first act of Othello is already into actionRead MoreAnalysis Of Othello By William Shakespeare1171 Words   |  5 PagesBODY PARAGRAPH 2 JEALOUSY Jealousy is a major component of both the text and the appropriation, as jealousy is what drives Iago to plot against Othello. Jealousy is largely present in the appropriation too, the breaking point for Hugo comes at the moment when his dad, who is the coach, presents Odin with the award for ‘Most Valuable Player’, and announces to the team that â€Å"I love him (Odin), like my own son†. It is at this point that Hugo starts conspiring against Odin. Odin receiving the M.V.PRead MoreAnalysis Of Shakespeare s Othello 1131 Words   |  5 PagesAn Analysis of Othello by Shakespeare Shakespeare is known for his use of recurring themes throughout his work, including love, death and betrayal. These themes are present in his work of Othello. However, the most fundamental issue is jealousy. The lives of the characthers in Othello are ruined by jealousy from the beginning to the end of the play. The telling of the story is carried out by passion, jealousy, and death. Shakespeare’s Othello reveals devastating tragic inevitability, stunning psychologicalRead MoreWilliam Shakespeares Othello1173 Words   |  5 Pages Othello is set in a world and focuses on the passions and personalities of its major figures. (Thomas). Othello is a tragedy by William Shakespeare. The work revolves around four central characters: Othello, Othellos wife Desdemona, his lieutenant Cassio and advisor Iago. The play appeared in seven editors between 1622 and 1705. The themes of the story are racism, love, jealousy, and betrayal. Othello is a black soldier who is accused of stealing hi s wife Desdemona. Although Desdemonas fatherRead MoreRacism In Othello Analysis829 Words   |  4 PagesRacism in Othello.† Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 3, Oct. 1993, p. 304. In this article, the author relates the idea of primal scene to racism in â€Å"Othello†. Primal scene is a psychoanalysis theory by Sigmund Freud. This theory claims once a child imagines or sees their parents having sexual relations they will be unable to repress this image from reappearing in their mind. The author relates this theory to the play â€Å"Othello† by mentioning

Kellogg’s Marketing Free Essays

Phase 1 Company’s Market Planning Colorado Technical University MKT210-1301B-07 Fundamentals of Marketing Lou Piermatteo February 25, 2013 Frosted Mini-Wheat’s The product I have chosen is Frosted mini-wheat. Frosted mini-wheat is one of the number one products of breakfast food. Frosted mini-wheat was first launched on the east coast in 1961. We will write a custom essay sample on Kellogg’s Marketing or any similar topic only for you Order Now In 1961 Frosted mini-wheat’s was nationally debuted making mornings shine from sea to shining sea. Frosted mini-wheat is made of whole-grain fiber to keep you at your best all morning long. We will be discussing the market strategy and mission goals of Kellogg’s frosted mini-wheat. Kellogg’s and frosted mini wheat’s take pride in helping people stay healthy and in fit. Company’s Mission Statement Frosted mini-wheat’s mission statement or jingle is â€Å" Keeps’em full and focused† (Kellogg’s 2012). Frosted mini-wheat’s is a big breakfast in a little biscuit. Kellogg’s believes that every morning should start with a healthy breakfast. Kellogg’s frosted mini-wheat’s has commercials all over the television today. They are ranked number 17 in television advertising. Frosted mini-wheat’s is one of the top cereal marketers; they market directly to the parent’s and not the children. The television commercial’s target children to get them to eat a more healthy breakfast to get their day started. Kellogg’s frosted mini-wheat’s is packed with fiber and almost a full days’ worth of gains to keep you full all morning(Kellogg’s 2012). Kellogg is a Global Company Committed to Building Long-Term Growth In Volume and Profit and to Enhancing its Worldwide Leadership Position by Providing Nutritious Food Products of Superior Value Company’s Business and Marketing objective and goals Kellogg’s is focused on enriching and delighting the world though foods and brands that matter. They are nourishing families so they can thrive and flourish. Kellogg’s is a company of possibilities and promises of people and their well-being. Today nutrition continues to be the core of our business. And cereal is an integral part of how we can help to meet the nutritional needs of people all over the world (Kellogg’s 2012). Kellogg’s believes in integrity, accountability, passion, humility, simplicity, and results. The more the company can do for the community the more people will want to buy their products. (Kellogg2012). What is the Company’s position in the Marketplace and it’s Differentiation Strategies? Kellogg’s is ranked number three is marketing facts from 2009 reports. They use television and internet marketing for their advertising. In February 2012, Kellogg’s introduced 2 dozen new products. They expected 15% of 2012 global sales from products introduced in the previous three years. Kellogg’s is commitment to product innovation has brands that consumers know and love (surperformance 2013). Kellogg’s financial highlights of 2011 show increases over the past five years. The net sales were up 4%, operation profit up by 2%, and the net earnings per share were up by 6%. Kellogg’s net sales for 2011 were $13. 2 billion dollars (Kellogg’s annual report 2011). The 2011 report shows the progress and future direction in four key areas; Marketplace, workplace, environment, and the community. Kellogg’s is dedicated to help the community. In February 2013, Kellogg’s pledged to provide one-half billion servings of breakfast to children and families who need it the most. They are the number one cereal company in the U. S. Kellogg has pledged $1 million in grants in the U. S. to nonprofit partners Action for Healthy Kids ®, Share Our Strength’s No Kid Hungry ® campaign and Food Research and Action Center so that more schools can participate in federally-funded breakfast programs. The company will also work to expand breakfast programs around the globe, maximizing product donations and advocating for the important role breakfast plays in the diet. (Kellogg2012). Control 42% of global market share for Pre-sweeter cereal, which is more than triple the market share of any of their competitors. They have the strongest brand recognition and advertising recollection of all the cereal manufacturers (Kellogg2012). Kellogg’s is a very passionate company. They look out for their customers just as much as their employee’s. The more a company does for the community the more people will buy their products. Frosted mini-wheat’s is a cereal that Kellogg’s has promoted and made a number one cereal. There are many different kinds of frosted mini wheat’s to keep up with the changes and taste of people today. Frosted mini wheat’s are a nutrition and healthy breakfast for everyone. They’re packed with fiber! That’s what makes whole grains so terrific. Starting your day with one bowl of Frosted Mini-Wheat’s ® cereal delivers 24% of the daily value of dietary fiber for adults. That’s 3 times the fiber compared to Honey Nut Cheerios. (Kelloggs2012). Kellogg maintained its previously provided outlook for 2013. For 2013, Kellogg expects net sales growth to be approximately 7%, while reported earnings (excluding impact of mark-to-market adjustments but including Pringles integration costs) are expected to grow between 5% and 7%. Reported operating profit ((excluding impact of mark-to-market adjustments) is expected to increase at a higher rate than earnings growth (Zacks2013). References www. 4-traders. com/kellogg-company. com www. kelloggcompany. com www. kelloggcompany2011annualreport. com http://sg. finance. yahoo. com/news/kellogg-beats-overall-keeps-2013-181621345. html www. frostedminiwheats. com www. sbaweb. wayne. edu/~ssasser/pp29. ppt How to cite Kellogg’s Marketing, Essay examples

Comparative Analysis of Stakeholder Management †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Comparative Analysis of Stakeholder Management. Answer: Introduction The mega projects are complex and very uncertain in nature thus, it requires effective stakeholder management. Stakeholder management enables a construction project to enhance their growth as well as brand image. In the recent years, Australia and India both have running mega projects. Thus, it is crucial for both countries to manage the stakeholder relationship. However, if an industry is not able to manage the stakeholder then conflicts between the stakeholders will be occurred (Mok et al. 2015). The mangers of a project need to accommodate the stakeholder interest by using their skill. This will enable the project managers to get best outcomes from their project. This study deals with the stakeholder management in India and Australian mega projects. Therefore, from this study, the issues of stakeholder management in a mega project and the way of managing stakeholders in a proper way will be evaluated. This research study sheds light on comparative analysis of stakeholder management in mega projects between India and Australia. Stakeholder management refers to the management of both internal and external stakeholders in an industry. In order to develop and delivery of a mega project stakeholder management is crucial for construction industry (Kerzner and Kerzner 2017). In Australia, the process of stakeholder management is changed. In the recent years, the mega project developers have divided their stakeholders into two groups that are the primary and secondary stakeholders. Primary stakeholder includes workforce and customers. Therefore, secondary stakeholders include suppliers, regulatory bodies, media and environmental group. Success of a mega project needs proper support from these stakeholders. On the other hand, in India, the corporate failure is found in construction industry. This is due to lack of good governance. However, for this reason, stakeholder management is essenti al in Indian mega projects. In Australia, there is a huge complexity in transport infrastructure, which is also categorized under construction industry. This project faced slow political sensitivity and diverse group of stakeholder engagement. Development of transport mega project has both positive and negative impact on the parties who are involved in this project. However, in India, there are a lot of conflicts between the stakeholder management in a mega project (Chang et al. 2013). It has been found that mega projects are considered as a closed system at the beginning of the project. However, if the legitimate stakeholders do not take part actively in decision-making process then high risk and consequences can occur in the mega project. In the context of Australia, an involvement of stakeholders in transportation decision-making process s a big challenge as it is important for managers to optimize the value and concern of stakeholders. Providing reward is a helpful process to op timize the value of stakeholders and to get the best outcome in a mega project. In Indian mega project, the managers focus more on the communication process and establishment of good stakeholder relationship. Research Questions What type of stakeholder management is followed in India and Australia? What are the success factors of stakeholder management in the mega-project? Which country has best stakeholder management between India and Australia? This research paper highlights a comparative analysis of the stakeholder management in mega projects between India and Australia. This paper seeks to identify the methods through which the stakeholder management in the mega project is done. Therefore, the major issues of stakeholder management will be evaluated in this paper. To understand the stakeholder management in Indian and Australian mega project To carry out a comparative analysis of stakeholder management in a mega project between India and Australia To identify the success factors achieved from stakeholder management in a mega project of India and Australia To critically evaluate the best stakeholder management between India and Australia Literature Review Stakeholder management is considered as a critical component to deliver a project successfully (Littau et al. 2015). A stakeholder is an individual or a group, which may bring a big effect on an organization. It is important for a construction industry to involve their stakeholders in decision-making as it is required to give shape the project. Stakeholders management is a process of building a good relationship with the stakeholders by managing their expectations and proposed objectives. However, for any project, stakeholder management is crucial as if there is no proper stakeholder management in a project then it will be difficult for an organization to enhance their growth as well as the profitability. However, stakeholder management is a plan and one type of control, which needs to be managed through underlying principles. Stakeholder management in a mega project focuses on the adoption of strategy. In order to manage the stakeholders, an organization, as well as construction industry, needs to gather proper information. Stakeholder management is focused on the relationship between the organization and their interest group (Giezen 2012). This relationship leaves a major impact on the organization. It is crucial for the mega project developer to manage their project stakeholders by minimizing the negative effect on a project. The main purpose of stakeholder management is to ensure that there is no obstacle in mega project. In constructor sectors stakeholder management is considered as a theory. Stakeholders are divided into internal and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders include an employee of the organization. Therefore, internal stakeholders provide finance to a project. External stakeholders refer to those people who are affected by a project (Eskerod et al. 2015). As for example, employee, partners and team members are internal stakeholders while, customer, government and external agencies are considered as external stakeholders. In the context of construction industry maximum projects include a lot of stakeholders and the diverse nature of stakeholders develops a conflict of interest. In construction project, the checklist of the stakeholders is big, which includes project management, facility manager, designer, shareholders, suppliers, competitors, banks, government, media, community, competitors, insurance company, general public and regional development agencies. In order to fulfill the expectations of stakeholders, the construction industry needs to identify their stakeholders properly. As argued by Eweje et al. (2012), registering stakeholders are the major risks for a construction industry. They often influence a project negatively. Stakeholders, who have a great power over the success of a megaproject, are vital for the construction industry. Construction industry often depends on external stakeholders such as resources, licenses, and financing. Stakeholder management model or stakeholder management umbrella is a vital model to understand the how to manage the stakeholders in a project. This strategic model includes four components such as stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, stakeholder communication and stakeholder engagement (Locatelli and Mancini 2014). Hence, by using the combination of these four components the mega project developers are able to manage their stakeholder relationship. However, effective stakeholder management is used to support any project and to identify the objectives of different stakeholders. Application of such model will be beneficial for an organization as well as construction industry to understand their stakeholder position and to build a good relationship with them by using effective communication. Several critical factors are associated with stakeholder engagement in mega project. One of the major factors is the identification of each stakeholder interest. However, if an organization is not able to identify the needs of their stakeholders then it will be difficult for them to satisfy their stakeholders and to establish a good relationship with them (Turner and Zolin 2012). Development of a robust stakeholder management plan is crucial to manage the stakeholders in a mega project. Use of a range of communication channels including local network is vital for stakeholder management. However, to lead a project towards the success it is important for construction industry to generate an effective communication with the stakeholders to enhance the stakeholder engagement. On the other hand, a stakeholder prioritizing roadmap is an essential factor of stakeholder engagements in mega project. Such prioritizing roadmap is beneficial to deal with a large number of stakeholders with diffe rent types and level. On the other hand, establishment of an effective system in the project is essential to manage the stakeholders. This can be done by taking feedback from the stakeholders. Such feedback helps the construction industry to take necessary decision based on the project. The major issue of stakeholder management in Australia is lack of proper support from each stakeholder. However, often one specific group supports a decision while another group is non-supportive. This is a major challenge for Australian construction industry. Such lack of support from all level of stakeholders is a major reason of failure of mega project in Australia. In India, the mega project developer has been facing huge communication challenge during their stakeholder management (Priemus 2010). Due to poor communication between the individuals and groups, the success rate of mega projects is decreased by 4% in India. Such barriers affect the success of construction projects in both Australia and India. Apart from these the regulatory bodies of both countries often bring obstruction in construction project. As for example, it is a big responsibility of Australian construction industry to reduce their impact on the environment. If the construction industry is not able to reduce t heir impact on the environment then they may face a legal issue. Stakeholder management in Australian mega project Australian mega project developers in the construction industry identify the stakeholders based on the nature of a project. In Australia mega project developers of construction industry operate in the global market (Mok et al. 2015). They follow joint venture strategy to enhance their market share. Hence, the construction industry regulates the relationship between different process agents by making a contract. A legal contract is maintained between the builders and the client during the mega project. There is a time limitation to finish the job in a mega project, which the stakeholders need to follow. Therefore, a budgetary target is given to stakeholders, which improves the stakeholder management in a pressured environment (Molwus et al. 2017). After the building contractions phase, other stakeholders such as clients and facilities can enjoy their interest thus, the management of stakeholders is maintained throughout the construction lifecycle. Australian mega project developer in Australia often faces challenges during their stakeholder management due to lack of proper definition of stakeholder roles. In Australia, construction industry manages their internal stakeholders by using effective communication. However, they gather feedbacks from internal stakeholders and then take a necessary decision based on this feedback. On the other hand, by using different communication channels mega project developer can communicate with the different stakeholders. Proper communication helps the management to identify specific needs of each stakeholder. As argued by Yang and Shen (2014), legal compliance is a vital part to build a good relationship with external stakeholders otherwise the operation process can be affected. AER or Australian Energy Regulator has published a new framework for stakeholder management in Australia (Aer.gov.au 2018). The construction industry of Australia needs to follow such framework in order to comply with legal requirements. This framework helps the mega project developers to meet the objectives of external agencies. As per the Environmental and Biodiversity Protection Act 1999, Australian construction industry needs to reduce their business impact from an environment. Hence, the mega project developers need to co-operate with external agencies during the audit program. This will help to manage the regulatory body as well as the external stakeholders in Australia. Stakeholder management in Indian mega project Project stakeholder management in India highlights the identification of group or individual. After identification of the stakeholders Indian mega project developers creates a plan for stakeholders management (Loosemore and Lim 2017). Poor communication between the stakeholders is a big problem of stakeholder management in Indian mega project. For this reason, the construction industry uses interpersonal and management skill to enhance the communication process. By creating proper collaboration and making transparency Indian mega project developers enhances the internal stakeholder management in construction industry. Indian construction industry follows a strategic approach to give priority to the stakeholders. Therefore, they use multi-fiduciary approach, which reveals the responsibilities of stakeholders. On the other hand, by taking stakeholder synthesis approach the construction industry in India deals with the stakeholders ethically. In order to comply with regulatory bodies, t he construction industry follows National Highway Act 1998 and Central Road Fund Act 2000. From the above analysis, it has been found that Australian mega project industry has faced issue due to lack of support from their all level of stakeholders. As criticized by Yang and Shen (2014), inadequate support from the stakeholders hamperS the success of a project. On the other hand, in India, there is a huge communication problem that is faced by the mega project developer. However, from the above comparative analysis of stakeholder management between India and Australia, it has been received that Australian mega project industry focuses on environmental sustainability in comparison to India. On the other hand, Indian mega project developer gives their concentration on keeping transparency and establishing effective communication. Research methodology plays a crucial role in the research study. However, the success of a research paper depends on its methodology. In this current study, secondary research methodology will be taken. In order to analyze the data qualitative method will be applied. A qualitative research method is an effective approach that enables the researcher to carry out an in-depth research. A range of techniques is used in this qualitative research method, which helps the individuals to understand the perspectives of people regarding any problem (Taylor, Bogdan, and DeVault, 2015). I this current study, a comparative analysis of stakeholder management in a mega project between India and Australia will be taken. Hence, by using qualitative research methodology an individual will be able to gather authentic data on this particular topic. Qualitative research can be done by using literature review and case study analysis. To understand the stakeholder management in the mega project of India and Australia case study analysis will be helpful. In this current study positivism, philosophy will be taken to conduct the research. Positivism philosophy depends on factual knowledge that is achieved from observation. This philosophy allows the researcher to collect limited data that is quantifiable (Lewis 2015). Positivism philosophy includes ontological view, which is helpful to incorporate reliable data in the research study. Deductive approach will be selected in this current research study. Deductive approach is beneficial to develop a hypothesis in the research study. In deductive approach, hypothesis is developed from proposition theory (Chang et al. 2013). Deductive research is beneficial to transfer the research findings from particular to general. Deductive approach is based on existing theory. In this research study, application of deductive approach will be beneficial to analyze data on stakeholder management in India and Australia by evaluating the existing theory. In this research project, descriptive design will be undertaken to collect data. Descriptive research design focuses on the present issue. This design method is helpful to identify the current issue of stakeholder management in mega projects between Australia and India. However, different aspects of research phenomenon can be described by descriptive design. Many variables can be employed by descriptive design while only one variable is used to conduct the descriptive design. Observational studies are the major components of descriptive design (Silverman 2016). Descriptive design is not limited to data collection and observation; however, it can specify case studies. In this present research study case study will be taken to collect data thus, a descriptive design will be applicable. Secondary data will be collected in this research methodology by using government websites, journals, and articles. To get authentic data from the databases exclusion and inclusion criteria will be used. To cover the qualitative analysis case study based on mega projects of Australia and India will be taken. Case study analysis will be beneficial for this study as it will provide in-depth information regarding the topic (Flick 2015). A case study is significant to provide detailed information on a specific topic. On the other hand, case study provides reliable and existing data to complete the research study. This research study is an objective based research and by using case study analysis the objectives of the research will be fulfilled. After gathering data this will be represented by using chart, tables, and graphs. During the conduction of a research, it is important to keep the reliability and validity of data. Often the individual is not able to take information from all jour nals due to reliability issue. Those journals are not authentic. In order to collect data maintenance of reliability is crucial as vague data may hamper the significance as well as the quality of the study. Validity of a research can be maintained by taking updated information. A good research methodology includes current information, which ensures the validity of the data. Moreover, manipulation needs to avoid during the representation of data and proper citation is required. Case study analysis of stakeholder management in mega project of India and Australia Sustainable Melbourne Fund or SMF has taken initiative to generate environmental and economic value in mega project stakeholder management in Australia. Darzin was used by SMF to make a good interaction with key stakeholders in order to deliver development initiatives. However, Darzin provides an essential tool to SMF to fulfill the key objectives in stakeholder management. The tools include a central record keeping system regarding the stakeholder information. Darzin tools also include a qualitative analysis to identify the stakeholder issues in managing the relationship regarding funding, which is essential for stakeholder management in SMF (Darzin.com 2018). In India, Gujarat International Finance Tea-City or GIFT is a popular construction project between Gandhinagar and Ahmadabad. Stakeholders such as International Monetary Fund and Agencies of United Nation are the major stakeholders of this project. In this project, the stakeholders are managed by using different communication channels as poor communication was the major barrier to this project. The main aim of this project is the development of eco-friendly design and energy efficient city (Thebetterindia.com 2018). The stakeholders are managed by using market research survey. Therefore, the coordination between the stakeholders was improved by taking feedbacks from both internal and external stakeholders. Expected Outcomes From the above study, it can be said that India and Australia have different stakeholder management issues. Therefore, the mega project developers have taken different initiatives to enhance the stakeholder management in these countries. Therefore, it can be said this study will help to understand the major challenges of stakeholder management in India and Australia. On the other hand, based on the literature review it can be assumed that by taking proper strategic action plan and communication plan both Australian and Indian mega project developers can identify the specific issue of each stakeholder. On the other hand, legal compliance with the external agencies is an effective approach to stakeholder management, which will allow the construction industry to avoid any legal obstacle in their project. Conclusion The entire piece of work highlights a comparative analysis of stakeholders management between Indian and Australian mega project. However, it is found that lack of adequate support and poor communication are the two major barriers to stakeholder management in mega project. Use of effective communication channels and proper coordination will be helpful to enhance the relationship between the stakeholders. On the other hand, stakeholder management in Australia and India depends on regulatory bodies. However, it is crucial for every mega project holder to comply with the regulatory bodies who are considered as the external stakeholders. References Aer.gov.au. 2018.AER publishes new Revised Stakeholder Engagement Framework. [online] Available at: https://www.aer.gov.au/communication/aer-publishes-new-revised-stakeholder-engagement-framework [Accessed 21 Mar. 2018]. Chang, A., Chih, Y.Y., Chew, E. and Pisarski, A., 2013. Reconceptualising mega project success in Australian Defence: Recognising the importance of value co-creation.International Journal of Project Management,31(8), pp.1139-1153. Darzin.com. 2018.Manage Stakeholder Relationships at Sustainable Melbourne Fund. [online] Available at: https://www.darzin.com/case-studies/sustainable-melbourne-fund-stakeholder-management [Accessed 21 Mar. 2018]. Eskerod, P., Huemann, M. and Savage, G., 2015. Project stakeholder managementpast and present.Project Management Journal,46(6), pp.6-14. Eweje, J., Turner, R. and Mller, R., 2012. Maximizing strategic value from megaprojects: The influence of information-feed on decision-making by the project manager.International Journal of Project Management,30(6), pp.639-651. Flick, U., 2015.Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research project. Sage, pp.23-25 Giezen, M., 2012. Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning.International Journal of Project Management,30(7), pp.781-790. Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Lewis, S., 2015. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Health promotion practice,16(4), pp.473-475. Littau, P., Jujagiri, N.J. and Adlbrecht, G., 2010. 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (19842009).Project Management Journal,41(4), pp.17-29. Locatelli, G. and Mancini, M., 2014. Risk management in a mega-project: the Universal EXPO 2015 case.International Journal of Project Organisation and Management,2(3), pp.236-253. Loosemore, M. and Lim, B.T.H., 2017. Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry.Construction management and economics,35(3), pp.90-105. Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.446-457. Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.446-457. Molwus, J.J., Erdogan, B. and Ogunlana, S., 2017. Using structural equation modelling (SEM) to understand the relationships among critical success factors (CSFs) for stakeholder management in construction.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,24(3), pp.426-450. Priemus, H., 2010. Mega-projects: Dealing with pitfalls.European Planning Studies,18(7), pp.1023-1039. Silverman, D. ed., 2016.Qualitative research. Sage, pp.20-25. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. and DeVault, M., 2015.Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley Sons, pp.67-100. Thebetterindia.com. 2018. [online] Available at: https://www.thebetterindia.com/17137/14-amazing-infrastructure-projects-india/ [Accessed 21 Mar. 2018]. Turner, R. and Zolin, R., 2012. Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames.Project Management Journal,43(5), pp.87-99. Yang, R.J. and Shen, G.Q., 2014. Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects.Journal of Management in Engineering,31(4), p.04014064.